USS Montana fiberglass hull, sub-deck/deck kit, and turrets from Strikemodels

Discussion in 'Product Review' started by froggyfrenchman, Mar 20, 2011.

  1. froggyfrenchman

    froggyfrenchman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Posts:
    3,358
    Location:
    Dayton, Ohio
    All
    The fiberglass hull, wooden sub-deck/deck kit, turrets, and plans for the USS Montana was on display at the build-session here in Ohio yesterday. And all of the folks that were able to see this kit were left in a state of shock and awe.
    Shock from the almost unbelievable size of this monster. And awe from the impeccable quality of this entire kit. The hull itself, is pristine. Length, and width are to exact scale measurements. The hull is nice and thick. Straight and true. The gelcoat is flawless. And the armor belt is straight, and crisp. The hull is a true work of art.
    The sub-deck/deck kit is truly a wonderful addition to the fiberglass hulls. Especially this new type from Strikemodels, where the sub-deck is pre-cut for the drop-in deck access hatches. This sub-deck fits into this hull nicely. And there won't be a lot of sanding/shaping required. The turret location holes are already cut, so it takes the guess-work out of having to determine where they go. The turrets are very nice looking, and will go a long way toward ending up with an attractive ship model that will be easy on the eyes. The barrel location holes are molded in, so no measuring will be required there. The ship plans are also crisp, accurate, and to scale.
    The service was very good, (as usual). I will post some photos of the kit. For your enjoyment..
    Mikey
     
  2. froggyfrenchman

    froggyfrenchman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Posts:
    3,358
    Location:
    Dayton, Ohio
  3. froggyfrenchman

    froggyfrenchman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Posts:
    3,358
    Location:
    Dayton, Ohio
  4. froggyfrenchman

    froggyfrenchman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Posts:
    3,358
    Location:
    Dayton, Ohio
  5. froggyfrenchman

    froggyfrenchman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Posts:
    3,358
    Location:
    Dayton, Ohio
  6. froggyfrenchman

    froggyfrenchman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Posts:
    3,358
    Location:
    Dayton, Ohio
  7. froggyfrenchman

    froggyfrenchman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Posts:
    3,358
    Location:
    Dayton, Ohio
  8. froggyfrenchman

    froggyfrenchman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Posts:
    3,358
    Location:
    Dayton, Ohio
  9. Jay Jennings

    Jay Jennings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    Posts:
    1,435
    Location:
    St. Croix, NS
    That is a very nice looking boat! How many units is a Montana anyway?
    Thanks for the pics Mikey,
    J
     
  10. NASAAN101

    NASAAN101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    Posts:
    2,504
    Location:
    Pittsburgh PA, USA
    Guys,
    God, she's Huge! but she'll be a nice boat when she's ready!! She's going to be a heavy little Bugger!!
    Nikki
     
  11. froggyfrenchman

    froggyfrenchman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Posts:
    3,358
    Location:
    Dayton, Ohio
    The Montana class battleships are 8 units.
    So, same units, and speed as the Yamato.
    Will most likely turn better.
    And also has the extra turret aft.
    Mikey
     
  12. mike5334

    mike5334 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Posts:
    1,877
    Location:
    Mississippi
    It may turn better, but those Yamatos can turn very well indeed. In fact, the full size ship was known for how tight it could actually turn.

    Will be interesting to see how they match up as models.
     
  13. CURT

    CURT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Posts:
    5,751
    Location:
    St. John's Newfoundland , Canada
    That is a Beaauuttiful MONSTER!!!!
    Can't wait to see it finished. Well I am sold. I will have to get one after the Wedding, the Honeymoon.
     
  14. Chris Easterbrook

    Chris Easterbrook Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2008
    Posts:
    1,333
    I think it will be nothing more than a BB magnet with a lot of undefend area. She has the same units as a yammy or Iowa, I would go with those as they are smaller with the same number of units.I would love to see a nice little 4.5 or 5.5 cuddle up beside her and rip out pannels now that would be something to see. While nice on paper I don't think she will make a great combat model.
     
  15. thegeek

    thegeek Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2008
    Posts:
    1,164
    Location:
    Mongo
    I have seen a USS Montana battle and it made the HMS Hood look good.
     
  16. mike5334

    mike5334 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Posts:
    1,877
    Location:
    Mississippi
    Remember, this ship is being built under Treaty rules which limits rate of fire and uses a scale speed chart. That changes the game a bit from the fast gun style of combat. :)
     
  17. Chris Easterbrook

    Chris Easterbrook Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2008
    Posts:
    1,333
    I can't see that to be enough to make it effective. Its too big and while fairly fast by treaty standards its only what 32 seconds. With that much mass her turn rate will just stink. The smaller boats will eat her for lunch.
     
  18. CURT

    CURT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Posts:
    5,751
    Location:
    St. John's Newfoundland , Canada
    Be great for current fast gun. It would be the same speed as the Yamato and Iowa in fast gun and with the3rd turret you can set up a dual side there or set up a tripple which may allow it to fire better over the stern or use the third turret as a dual stern sidemount or keep it within the stern arc and set it up as a death y. I like the options on a ship that long with a 4th turret. Now if we can get the H39 into it and the Soviet Sovietksky Soyuz which standard displ 59,150 tons, and 65,150 tons LOA- 889ft - Beam 127.8ft and draught 33ft.6 in
    Armament 9-16in 3x3
    12-6 in 6x2
    8 - 3.9 in guns
    32.37 mm
    8 - 12.7 mm
    164,000 shp
    4 shafts- 28 knots
    Armor Belt upt to 16.75
    Deck 8.7
    Turret Faces 19.7
    Secondary Turrets 3.9in
    Conning Tower 16.75

    The Giant hull was indentified on the slipway by Luftwaffe reconnassiance flights. The hull was broken up on the slipway after the war.
    I will post a pic of how it would look when completed. Had a bearing resemblance to the final classes of US ships.

    Montana is only about 3 -4 in longer than Iowa with a wider beam should be more stable and turn quite well with the dual rudders.
     
  19. KeriMorgret

    KeriMorgret Facilitator RCWC Staff Vendor

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2009
    Posts:
    609
    Location:
    Seattle, Washington
    Actually, the Montana is closer to ten inches longer than the Iowa.
     
  20. bikefish

    bikefish Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Posts:
    79
    O wow...thats a big boat